Monday November 24th 2014


The whole idea of a “Chosen People” was that God would be their only King.  But the history  of the Jews was such that, time and again, they begged God to give them a king -like all the nations around them.

As it happened, the monarchy  among the Chosen People was a mixed blessing.  There were some good kings: David, Jehoshapat, Hezekiah, and Josiah.  But, starting with Solomon, most were at best ambiguous and at worst downright disasters.  So bad were they that there was no move to restore the kingship after the Exile, when the monarchy came to an end (in 587 B.C.)

The prophets longed for a very different king of kings: one who would give the people of God joy, victory, peace and justice.  The desire for justice grew into an expectation of an earthly paradise.   With Ezekiel emerged a conscious longing, not for a new kind of king, but for a Moses-like figure to restore the Kingship of God, the supreme and only King of the Jews.

It is clear from the Gospel accounts that Jesus had no political ambitions;  he carefully avoided being cast in the role of a “Pretender” to any earthly crown.  In rejecting secular notions of kingship for himself, he pointed to his real royalty as Son  of the Most High and he spent his active years putting in place the possibility of the Kingdom of God.

Hence there is great poignancy in the inscription nailed to the Cross of Christ: INRI “Iesus NAZARENUS REX IUDEORUM (JESUS OF NAZARETH, KING OF THE JEWS).

We, his followers, become subjects of the Kingdom of God when God snatches us from the power of darkness to transfer us to the kingdom of his Son, in whom we have redemption (cf Col 1:13).

Although the feast of Christ the King was only established in the early years of the twentieth century, the reality of his kingship and the presence of the Kingdom of God is part of the DNA of Christianity from the beginning.

We need “eschatological glasses”, that is a perspective on the Last Times to get a clear focus on the Kingship of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

Fr Sean Wales, C.Ss.R.



You will look in vain for the word Purgatory in the bible.  But there are plenty of  instances of the words purge, purged, purgeth and purging! These all have the same root which relates to purification, cleansing, emptying.

One of the most helpful definitions of purgatory comes in a A New Catechism  of Christian Doctrine’ (by Herbert McCabe O.P.):

Q. What do we call the detachment from things of this world that remains for us in death?

A. The final detachment from the things of this world that happens to us when we die in Christ is called purgatory.

Even if the word purgatory is not to be found in the bible, the notion of a final stage or state of cleansing or purgation underlies the action of Judas Maccabees in offering sacrifice for those who had died in their sins, for if he were not expecting that those who had falled would rise again, it would have been superfluous and foolish to pray for the dead (2 Maccabees 12;44).

Jesus himself talked about forgiveness in this age or in the age to come (Mt 21:32).

Its obvious that many of us die with unfinished business, sometimes unprepared to be in the presence of the Holy God.  Surely the very process of dying is itself a purification, indeed the most radical purification of all: we are set free from everything.   We leave all this in the hands of God and pray peaceably for those who have gone before us, marked with the sign of faith.

Our November Book of the Dead and our Mortuary List throughout the year are among the ways we help those who have died; and they too in their turn can pray for us and help us.  this is an attractive aspect of the Communion of Saints: each asks for each what each most wants to find.

Eternal rest grant unto them O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon them;  may they rest in peace.

Fr Sean Wales, C.Ss.R.



It may seem strange to have a liturgical celebration of a building.  But todays feast is not alone: we have a feast of the Dedication of St Peters in Rome; we have a feast for the dedication of our own Cathedral in the Archdiocese.

As you might expect, such feasts are highly symbolic.  The Lateran basilica in Rome  is called the mother and head of all the churches in the city and the world.  It was given this title because it was the first great basilica to be built after the Emperor Constantine granted freedom of religion within the Roman Empire in 313 A.D.

The word basilica [a Greek word] was used for an imposing building  which functioned as a law court and/or commercial centre.  When the early Christians were free to congregate openly for divine worship they modelled their first churches on these grand regal structures.

The subject of todays feast had been the ancient palace of the Laterani    family.  The Christians remodelled it, built a beautiful baptistry and a dwelling for the Bishop of Rome, successor to St Peter.

For centuries the Popes lived in the Lateran and the church was the cathedral of the diocese of Rome.  Indeed, the Basilica of St John Lateran is still the cathedral of Rome.

For Catholics of the Latin Rite (so-called Roman Catholics ) todays feast  expresses our link to the Bishop of Rome and our love for the church of Rome, presiding in charity over the whole Catholic Community.

Of course, while church buildings have a physical importance, the deeper      significance of todays feast lies in the “living stones”, the house of God, that we are.  Just as we cherish our own local church building, so we are called to cherish every living stone, every single member  of our faith community.

For Redemptorists, today has an extra significance as it was on this day that  St Alphonsus, our founder, began our Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer, 282 years ago.

Fr Sean Wales, C.Ss.R.



Such are the logistics involved in preparing the bulletin that I have to write this column on Wednesday; a great deal of energy and attention is on the International Food Fair on Friday so I am going to express my thanks for something which (at this moment) hadnt happened yet!

But that’s not a problem as I have seen how much work and effort has gone into the Food Fair.  I have on my desk a list of people with pivotal roles in preparing the Food Fair -there are over thirty people highly involved in doing the organizing and they all involve lots of other people so that the whole thing is a real parish effort.

Therefore I want to say a very sincere word of thanks to all the stall holders and their helpers, to all the parish groups, to the generous suppliers and to everyone who in any way contributed to our food Fair 2014.

An event like the Food Fair 2014 is good for the parish at many levels.  It is obviously good for our capital projects as it generates much needed money to continue with the Garden of Remembrance, the provision of storage in the Hall and other expenses which continually surprise us.

It is also good for the ethos of the parish; the shared undertaking, the communal effort and the spirit of co-operation, these are qualities which mark a healthy parish community.

The Food Fair is also good for the spiritual life of the parish being as it is a project of service to the whole parish.

So, my thanks to God for this years Food Fair is without qualification;  I pray that all the effort and long hours of preparation will have brought us closer to God and to one another.

Thanks again to everyone, not only those who prepared the Fair but to all who came to participate on the night.

Fr Sean Wales, C.Ss.R.



The synod on the family made news this week in the media around the world. As is the custom after a series of discussions in open session, the Synod moves into small group discussion. To help in the small group discussions and to give everyone a sense of the open debate a Post-discussion document is released. This document is not a decision but a working paper for the small group discussions to follow. But the document hit the headlines because of its sensitive, positive and hopeful spirit.

This working paper is in three parts it summarises the listening, looking, talking that went on in the first week.

Listening:          The working paper gave a summary of what had been said in terms of the context and challenges to the family today.

Looking:            This section was concerned with looking on Christ and seeing marriage and family life in terms of the Gospel. This section included much in the way of the beauty and holiness of family and mercy.

Talking:              The final section gave a perspective on the debates which have already taken place in the synod. It was the tone of this section which drew the most positive attention.

It spoke with great compassion of those in difficult situations. It addressed the widespread practice of living together before or instead of marriage; it wrestled with the situation of those who are divorced and remarried and opened various possibilities of a positive pastoral response. In terms of the media, most attention was given to the positive remarks on homosexuality. The document spoke of homosexual having gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community and asked are we capable of welcoming these people, guaranteeing to them a fraternal space in our communities. It pointed out how same-sex relationships can even “to the point of sacrifice constitute a precious support in the life of the partners.

Everything about the document and the Synod breathes hope and pastoral sensitivity.

As Archbishop Brislin said on Vatican Radio on Tuesday We have to get away from judging and condemning and to say how we can give support.

Good news indeed.

Fr Sean Wales, C.Ss.R.

 Page 1 of 33  1  2  3  4  5 » ...  Last » 


Garden of Remembrance Project update


November 2014
« Oct